Thursday, October 31, 2013

Bernardo Bertolucci’s ‘You and Me’: The Big Shot is back ,but not with a Bang….!




“It’s very strange, isn’t it? I remember Renoir gave me this fantastic piece of advice. He said that when you direct you should always leave the door open because unexpected things can come in. In other words, don’t structure everything too rigidly because then there won’t be room to experiment.”--- wistfully reminisced Bernardo Bertolucci in a recent interview and those who have fallen under the spell of this prodigy would never have an iota of hesitation to concede how faithfully he has stuck to his illustrious predecessor’s advice. His latest  endeavour, ‘Me and You’, an Italian language film, does not break away from this mould. But I’m afraid the diehard fans of  Bertolucci, whose cinematic creed and craft so profoundly inspired heavyweights like Francis De Coppola, Steven Spielberg and Martin Scorsese , would discover a rather faint resonance of the  cinematic prowess and panache which he is known for in the film. The reason is perhaps the minimalist approach he has adopted ,or should I say, been forced to adopt(because he has been infirm for the last one decade and had to direct the film from his wheel chair) in his treatment.
     
 





Thematically , Bertolucci’s film focuses on a subject which recurs in quite a few of his seminal films at varying degrees---the dynamics of the adolescence psyche and the loss of innocence. Fourteen year old  Fabrizio  is  dying to be alone for a while living his own life in solitude. He equips himself with enough provisions for a week and hibernates down in his mother’s basement having lied to her that he is out on a school skiing trip for a week . But his blissful solitude away from the mumbo jumbo of day to day  life  is somewhat ruffled up when his half-sister Olivia suddenly  emerges from nowhere and discovers him in his hideout. If Fabrizio ,who is desperate to be left alone , is in the throes of some ‘weird’  claustrophilia ,Olivia, once a promising photographer and now a recovering junkie, is no less troubled and tormented  a teenager  suffering withdrawal symptoms from her drug abuse, and pained by her family’s callous indifference to  her. What follows is a modest and minimalist yet considerably absorbing psychological drama of self discovery and reconciliation played out with considerable veracity. It is a film which, cutting across its  dismal and gloomy contour, winds up arousing a flipper of optimism.
   Given its minimalist context, ‘Me and You’ is a well-shot, well-directed, and well-edited film. The entire  story virtually unfolds itself in a stuffy and stingy basement area involving two characters. Quality close quarter cinematography with a judicious blending of shots and angles and spiffy editing rhythms successfully  redeem the claustrophobic ambience . Yet one must concede the dash and verve of the maker of ‘The Dreamer’, ‘The Last Emperor’, ‘The Conformists’ and the ‘The Last Tango in Paris’ are palpably conspicuous by their absence in ‘Me and You’ and , and consequently the film, despite being a tonal beauty reminiscent of Bertolucci’s deftness as a top notch director, turns out to be a letdown for his connoisseurs.
 

Monday, April 9, 2012

Pablo Georgelli’s “Las Acasias’: A Panegyric of the Language of Cinema


         

     
High voltage drama,  throwaway anecdotes that unveil sublime and somewhat enigmatic philosophical truth about life at the end,  hilarious episodes which involve quaint and quirky hitchhikers ,  unpredictable deterrents that suddenly turn a cool journey into a cliff-hanger ----the familiar ingredients of a run-of-the-mill  or  a serious road movie which make it work--------are simply conspicuous by their absence in ‘Las Acacias’, a ‘confirmed’ road movie…! Sounds paradoxical, but Pablo Giorgelli’s debut feature ‘Las Acacias’(2011)  virtually subverts  the usual stereotype of this well known genre and yet looms large as a profound cinematic beauty reminiscent of the best in the business….! Since  premiered in the International Critics' Week section of the 2011 Cannes Film Festival winning the festival's coveted award for Best First Feature Film, the film has had an enviably glorious run so far grabbing more than half a dozen of prestigious awards in well known festivals across the globe. 

     A road movie definitely it is , at least structurally and stylistically. But I am smitten more by the film’s enormous genre-straddling potentialities. ‘Las Acasias’, which  apparently tells a ‘deceptively’ simple story of two strangers going on a long and tangibly tedious journey together, reveals so much more. Ruben(German De Silva) is a  lonely middle aged truck driver who has been driving the route between Paraguay and Buenos Aires for close to thirty years carrying wood. One day, the even tenor  of Ruben’s  routine journey  is  suddenly perturbed as he has to reluctantly transport a young woman, Jacinta (Hebe Duarte) and her five month old baby, Anahi to Buenos Aires as a favour for his employer. Their journey begins in silence and it remains almost wordless till the end . But as the journey progresses so does their relationship. Through an exquisite blend of minimalist verbal communication and eloquent non verbal communication , the story gradually unfolds itself . Mostly a quiet  entity,  Jacinta  occasionally shows up the sober and solemn but sad and sensitive woman in her. She has a daughter who has no father. In a desperate bid to fend for herself and her daughter, she is migrating to Argentina to live with a cousin who, in turn, is expected to  help her get a job.  Ruben has a son, whom he met for the first time when he  was four, and has not met for long eight years. He has a sister whom he seldom meets.  The silence of the physical journey, however, fails to silence the journey into hearts fed by compassion and empathy. And over the course of the film  their hearts, as distinctly evident in the final sequence, palpably sink into each other’s despite  an utter lack of verbal communication between them. Thus ‘Las Acasias’ is about  a journey that unravels before us an intensely human tale of survival, loneliness,  compassion , friendship  and , above all, the amazing prospect  of human connection and empathy  that might potentially  culminate in love…. And what is still more amazing is all that is neatly  and palatably packed in an- hour- plus, near silent movie…..!
      Having said all that about the film’s thematic appeal, let me concede the storyline is not exactly its forte.  A cinephile  enamoured of  road movies must have seen it so many times  in  a far more delectable form that he might easily and justifiably find its  plot  a hackneyed one. What makes  ‘Las Acasias’ stand out from the crowd  is the extraordinary cinematic  treatment of  its ‘ordinary’ threadbare subject. After having  savoured  a plethora of  biggies of the genre ,which include  thought provoking swashbucklers  and nail biters like Godard’s ‘ Pierrot le Fou’(1965), Anthony Minghella’s ‘Cold Mountain’(2003), Sean Penn’s ‘ Into the Wild’(2007), Walter Salles’ ‘ The Motorcycle Diaries’(2004) ,and sensitive brain teasers like Bergman’s ‘Wild Strawberries’(1957) , Dustin Hoffman starrer ‘Rain Man’(1988) and Danis Hopper’s classic ‘Easy Rider’(1969),  I was naturally anticipating a similar engrossing and fulfilling experience as I was all set to sit through ‘Las Acasias’.  Moving  and  soothing  an experience it turned out  to be. But then ,to my sheer amazement , it also turned  out to be  a thoroughly different cinematic journey! ….More than 90% of the screen space is occupied by  the insipid , lacklustre, stuffy  cabin of a truck  that plies along an excruciatingly  long and equally  lacklustre route . The cabin is occupied by two strangers  who , not to speak of engaging in any vigourous verbal communication , hardly talk to each other. Nor  does the film have any music except the actual sounds that are integral part of such a truck journey.  Apparently  , ‘Las Acasias’ does not hold out any promise of a gripping , moving  cinematic experience…But its director has a different take on the issue and he has all the deftness of a master director to pull off his offbeat approach to his ‘commonplace’ theme. His actors may not talk , but their faces do eloquently. Pablo Georgelli  makes the most of the miraculous power of the faces of his cast to exude emotions and feelings spontaneously.  Ruben often squints into his side mirrors, supports on a diagonal time and again  as he drives along or resumes driving after a halt, and one can see the vehicles zooming up behind his truck and passing him---a spectacle which gives an impression he is actually driving.  Absence of music  in the film only heightens the verisimilitude sensitizing the audience to the actual sounds around . One can discern the directorial sleight in the use of light as well. While the cabin sequences betray a feel of real light, the few outdoor sequences  that the film has are no exception. It is quite convincing to see the images and shadows being reflected on the window panes as darkness gradually  descends . In fact, the mise-en-scene  is contrived , designed and presented in such a naturalistic way that one can not interact with the film as a mere onlooker . One becomes part of it. As one sits through the film, one discovers oneself with Ruben , Jacinta and Anahi in real time living their experience as an ‘ invisible’ co-passenger. But it is undoubtedly the excellent close quarters cinematography which emerges as the tramp card of the film’s extraordinary cinematic treatment. The director and the cinematographer were definitely at the pinnacle of their creative prowess as they filmed the cabin sequences using a wide variety of appropriate  angles successfully recreating  the tedium and vapidity of a long truck journey and simultaneously redeeming the monotony with proper variations.

       Pablo Georgelli’s 'Las Acasias’  is not a nail biter or a swashbuckler of the genre it represents. But I can assure you ,as a film buff, I have never  seen any other road movie as soothing as Pablo Georgelli’s maiden venture. Kudos to ‘Las Acasias’….











Sunday, February 12, 2012

‘Jankfai Jonak’(From the Shadow of Silence): A Tale of Technical and Thematic Triumph in a Troubled Terrain

Faith is part and parcel of a belief-system. Faith at its best inspires, fortifies, makes life worth living…..! Faith is a glimmer of hope in the teeth of the worst of odds….!But human history also bears testimony to the grim reality that all that faith epitomises is not rosy……! Faith, which almost always preys on the credulity of common masses, may culminate in catastrophes….! Faith, which has a borderline with superstition as flimsy as air, is always vulnerable to the unscrupulous designs of the Machiavellian as well as the malicious motives of the green-eyed monsters……! Sanjib Sabhapandit’s ‘Jangfai Jonak’(From the Shadow of Silence) is a critique of this ugly face of faith which has an uncanny potential to spell doomsday for innocent and innocuous individuals…..! Two highly contemporary and veracious stories are juxtaposed in the plot to drive home to the audience the perspective of the film. Both the stories the film works around are well-knit both thematically and structurally. One features an innocent adolescent who is made a ‘Baba’(A God Incarnate) despite his reluctance by the gullibility of common masses . In the other, a malicious suitor and an avaricious fortune-teller join hands to conspire against an innocuous young girl . Capitalising on the credulity of naive rural masses , they make her a ‘Daini’(Witch) and brutally kill her. Sanjib Sabhapandit is a serious filmmaker who has an uncompromising knack of dealing with themes of intense human appeal and profound social relevance in his films . Both of his first two films “Juye Pora Son” and “Jatinga Ityadi” were highly extolled by critics and connoisseurs alike for their cerebral themes . ‘Jangfai Jonak’ is no exception. But what has fascinated me most about “Jangfai Jonak’ is its amazing technical finesse hitherto unknown to Assamese Cinema. While Sanjib Sabhapanjit’s first two films were marred by technical blemishes glaring enough to vitiate cinematic beauty, ‘Jangfai Jonak’ has certainly broken that jinx and loomed large as a cinematic triumph. The film ,in fact, is a fitting reply to the much hyped skepticism of certain film pundits about the adequacy of HD cameras for shooting quality feature film. The cinematography of the film is simply impeccable except in a few moving shots. Parashar Borua wielded his lenses superbly to capture the hues and mood so evocatively…The film can boast of some of the best shot night/low-lit sequences in Assamese cinema. Top notch editing is another cynosure of the film. The editor duo (Saurabh Dutta and Ratul Deka) have adroitly resorted to ‘tight cut’, split edits, L-cuts/J-cuts, camera zooms , blow-ups , matching action and other digital intermediaries to give rise to a delightful visual treat that mimics real life experiences so well and makes acting so real that it does not feel like acting. While all true blue movie buffs appreciate how crucial an element lighting is for filmmaking, one of the most underrated elements in Assamese Cinema is ironically the light designs. In recent times, no Assamese feature film barring ‘Adajjya’ could live up to my expectations in lighting design. I am thrilled to find a second one in ‘Jangfai Jonak’. Skillful employment of both hard light and soft light to create a sense of verisimilitude all throughout the film , astoundingly natural looking night sequences and indoor scenes are what impress me most in ‘Jangfai Jonak’. Although the lighting effect falters a bit in the final night sequence, I have not an iota of hesitation to concede it is still a beautifully shot, highly natural looking night sequence rare in Assamese Cinema. Annirudha Boruah’s background score is highly spiffy and quite in tune with the mood and spirit of the film. Equally admirable is the job of the Make up Artist as well as the Art Director. Sanjib Sabhapandit, who has also done a near perfect script for his film, has,indeed, struck a perfect equilibrium with his technical crew motivating everyone to render an optimal performance and thereby ensuring a highly accomplished final cut .The director’s deftness is not circumscribed to the film’s technical finesse alone. He has motivated his cast to deliver a convincing performance collectively. Sanjib Sabhapandit’s predilection for minute details in ‘Jangfai Jonak’ is instantly reminiscent of that of Jahnu Barua and Dr. Bhabendranath Saikia in their critically acclaimed films. ‘Jangfai Jonak’---a good movie indeed virtually from every cinematic perspective. Here is finally an Assamese feature film which has redefined for Assamese filmmakers how a technically sound and thematically appealing film may be made on a shoestring budget creatively and judiciously falling back on latest sophisticated technology of digital filmmaking.

Monday, January 2, 2012

Fallen Under the Spell of Two Debuts.....!



Paradoxically enough, two debuts out of a plethora of cerebral European films I have savoured in recent times have waltzed their ways into my heart ! The first one is an idyllic brain-teaser , Australian author Julia Leigh’s debut film ‘The Sleeping Beauty’(2011).The film has already loomed large as a cynosure in the festival circuits worldwide. The other is Swedish actress Pernilla August’s directorial debut ‘Beyond’(Svinalangorna). ‘Beyond’ found a cosy berth on the global art-house circuit last year.
To encapsulate in a single sentence , ‘Beyond ‘is a haunting tale of the familiar menace of alcoholism , its resultant abuse and how it unhinges the equilibrium of domestic life often precipitating a traumatic experience for the children. Although almost perpetually pertinent a theme it is to any human society, there is nothing catchy , nothing much spectacular about it... Just ‘old wine in new bottle’ kind of stuff....But what perhaps makes ‘Beyond’ go beyond its lacklustre thematic matrix is its awesome treatment ...... An impeccable cast, unadorned and naturalistic yet kinetic cinematography and lighting style that lends the film an almost doc-like verisimilitude, highly creative and suggestive use of flashbacks, a gripping narrative technique , are all exquisitely blended together in the film to culminate in a cinematic triumph...!!! A drama set in 1970s Sweden ,‘Beyond’ is essentially the story of Leena, an attractive thirty-something mother with a caring and dotting husband, and two cute ,affectionate daughters. Her Christmas Day is shattered by a call she hangs up on. It is from her mother , a moribund patient in the distant Swedish town where she grew up. Persistent to see her daughter one last time before she departs, she has the hospital call on her behalf. Visibly ruffled up Leena ‘surprisingly’ conceals the call from her family and goes out for a swim. When she returns, it is obvious the hospital persisted, because her husband is seen gearing up for a long journey with the kids who are ‘strangely’ in the dark about the existence of a maternal grandmother. A visibly reluctant Leena has now no choice but to make the trip. The tedious 800-km journey is intercut with memories from her childhood ---memories of a turbulent home cropping up before her. A series of flashbacks gradually explain Leena’s anger and , above all ,her psyche that provoked her to cut all ties with her alcoholic mother ........Leena’s family palpably in the throes of economic uncertainty moved from Finland to Sweden to turn over a new leaf. It was a family of four----father Kimmo, mother Aili, Leena and her younger brother Sakari. Kimmo was a tippler , a wife-beater and a domestic tyrant, and Aili, too, took to drinking to console herself for the dependent masochistic mess which was her fate. Leena was forced to be mother to Sakari and keep up some facade of normality at school and before the neighbours. Quite tangibly Leena’s childhood and adolescence turned out to be nothing but a trail of endless nightmares. An ‘awfully’ sombre territory “Beyond’ takes us through...But the debutant August exudes great directorial deftness in redeeming the despair aesthetically through two well contrived ingredients---a highly spiffy and suggestive background score and an equally suggestive subplot. The background music, which alternates sombre chords with lighter classical piano melodies, helps maintain the emotional equilibrium . A subplot involving the young Leena’s penchant for swimming and her success as a swimming prodigy falls back on water as a motif --- motif which evocatively suggests the girl’s emotional edification and fortitude to survive.

Any connoisseur of cinema is sure to find ‘ Sleeping Beauty’ a mind-boggling cinematic enigma, ambiguous and unsettling……! But this can hardly dissuade him from plunging deep into the cinematic marvel that this flick is. Julia Leigh’s debut film ‘Sleeping Beauty’ is instantly reminiscent of a subversive edition of the Sleeping Beauty figure of the most popular versions of the classic fairy tale in which the Sleeping Beauty epitomizes the archetypal passive heroine. But given the multi-layered meanings this film works its way around, calling it a mere subversive modernist version of the classic fairy tale seems a gross understatement. The film palpably coaxes a discerning connoisseur into falling back on current psychoanalytical and feminist film theory to interpret the internal dynamics that make ‘Sleeping Beauty’ so catchy and cerebral a film in the same breath. It is a film about ‘Male Gaze’, about the nature of subtle commodification of woman in a predominantly patriarchal set up. It is a critique of the nature of sexual aggression as well. But all this is not enough to enable us to categorize it. ‘Sleeping Beauty’ is an awesome sensory film that eludes simple explanation. The debutant director , her cinematographer and her art director have combined well to display a superb sense of visual storytelling which manifests itself in the construction of each scene. Deft employment of soft light and vivid primary colours, highly spiffy and minimalist background music add to the overall appeal of the film. But the cynosure of “Sleeping Beauty’ is none but the sleeping beauty of the film, Emily Browning who has delivered a stellar performance in a highly challenging role.
Lucy (Emily Browning), a university student who gets engaged in several jobs to meet her ends is the ‘enigmatic’ Sleeping Beauty ----enigmatic because what motivates her in life is a complete mystery . Yes, she has to work part time to fend for herself, primarily to sustain her university life .But then her attitude towards life seems one of sheer indifference and casualness. To our sheer astonishment, she decides whom to sleep with by flipping a coin .Perhaps it is this nonchalant attitude to life and ambivalent take on sex coupled with her innate tenacity to conform to the currents which provoke her to be on an astounding and somewhat absurd spree of activities. She first accepts a job that requires wearing lingerie while serving wealthy elderly dinner guests, and later takes another where she is consensually tranquilized and left alone with aged men. Lucy’s jobs obviously do not involve any actual sessions of sex or lovemaking. But they all indicate something sombre within some men that make them want to dominate women. Thus ,with Lucy drugged asleep and then awakened with no memory of what has happened, these aged folk surpass and tame Lucy the woman in an intricate power equation. From this perspective, ‘Sleeping Beauty’ exposes the nature of sexual violence as a ‘masculine’ phenomenon that springs from a callous desire to wield power and degrade and not from sexuality as such.
Lucy’s ‘casual’ attitude to sex cajoles us to probe deeper the moment we confront the film’s reluctance to show any visually explicit sexual content on screen and also to attribute any emotional essence to whatever representation of sexuality it has . A galaxy of naked or semi-naked characters permeate through , but no scene of actual sex or lovemaking. In stead the film presents a series of situations where the expression of sexuality exudes artificiality. ‘Sleeping Beauty’ might tantalise those who are perpetually in a scramble after mere erotic and emotional fulfillment in films. But the serious moviegoers are sure to be smitten by the cerebral issues the film raises and the technical finesse with which it is done.

Thursday, September 8, 2011


Mise en scène of a Mystic Man: The Iconography of a Suave Filmmaker

‘There is a cure for everything except death’, proclaimed a brooding Antonio Ricci resonating an unfazed tinge of optimism in Bicycle Thieves, one of Dr. Bhupen Hazarika’s most favourite movies. This 1948 neo-realist classic of Vittorio de Sica along with Indian maestro Sayajit Ray’s masterpiece ‘Pather Panchali’ and few other New Wave films not only cast a spell on Bhupen Hazarika but also infused into him the spirit of cinema and moulded the conscientious filmmaker in him. And those who have taken a plunge into the cinematic world of this living legend have not an iota of doubt about the robust optimist and the conscientious filmmaker he epitomises. In a cerebral article “Chalachitra Sangha Andolanar Uddeshya Ki” inducted in “Sundarar Na-Diganta”(The New Horizons of The Beautiful), a seminal book published in 1967, Dr. Bhupen Hazarika unambiguously gave vent to his take on the essence of films. To him, a good film is not just an unflinching fountain of innocuous entertainment but an efficient and potent tool of mass education and cultural awareness. Throwing lurid light on the mottos of the film associations, he reiterated that the mottos of a film society should include a well-contrived strategy to persuade the filmmaker to make films keeping in view scientific and cultural education for the masses. The film should inculcate an ardent penchant in the society to learn more. He advocated making of scientific, educational, cultural movies and creation of awareness of making a film with all these values.
Dr. Hazarika forayed into Indian cinema at a crucial transitional juncture in the 6os when the Indian New Wave Cinema was fast gaining momentum and all set to give a fresh lease of life to the language of cinema in India. This Parallel Cinema Movement began to take shape from the late 1940s to the 1960s under the stewardship of prodigies such as Satyajit Ray, Ritwik Ghatak, Bimal Roy, Mrinal Sen, Khwaja Ahmad Abbas, Chetan Anand and V. Shantaram. This period is considered part of the 'Golden Age' of Indian cinema. Filmmakers of this era collectively created a body of work known for its ‘technical brilliance , artistic simplicity and thematic grandeur’. This cinema heavily drew upon the Indian literature of the times, and hence emerged as an important study of the contemporary Indian society, and is now used by scholars and historians alike to map the changing demographic and socio-economic dynamics as well as political temperament of the Indian populace. They used it to highlight prevalent issues and sometimes to throw open new issues for the public. Certain films of this New genre turned out to be revenue grossers in an industry propelled and dominated by the so-called mainstream films structured round fantastical song and dance, and replete with extravagant action and bizarre melodrama. These films palatably blended features of both art and commercial cinema. Bimal Roy's ‘Do Bigha Zamin’ (1953), which was both a commercial and critical success, was one of the earliest examples of this ‘fusion’ cinema. The film won the International Prize at the 1954 Cannes Film Festival and paved the way for the Indian New Wave. Hrishikesh Mukherjee, one of Hindi cinema's most successful filmmakers, loomed large as one of the few successful exponents of this much raved about 'middle cinema', which, according to Encyclopedia Britannica, carved a middle path between the extravagance of mainstream cinema and the stark realism of art cinema. He was renowned for making films that reflected the changing middle-class ethos in a serious but entertaining way. Another filmmaker to exquisitely mingle art and commercial cinema was Guru Dutt, whose film Pyaasa ( 1957) featured in Time magazine's "All-TIME" 100 best movies list. As a filmmaker making his debut at this transitional juncture of Indian cinema in the 60s, Dr. Hazarika seemed to be inexorably caught up in a rather twilight zone. But as a confirmed philanthropist and mass artist with pragmatic moorings , he naturally showed allegiance to the ‘fusion ‘or ‘middle’ cinema . Thus Dr. Bhupen Hazarika’s films are often imbued with the familiar ingredients of a formulaic, run of the mill mainstream entertainer. But then they are always exhilarated with emotionally vibrant and socio-culturally veracious and relevant themes ----themes explored and treated with the panache and dexterity of a serious filmmaker. Always tangible in them is the filmmaker’s longing to serve certain altruistic ends.
Dr. Bhupen Hazarika’s directorial debut ‘Era Bator Sur’(Tunes of the Abandoned Road) hit the screen in 1956. His maiden venture unveiled before the discerning audience his conscious endeavour to lend a touch of realism in line with the New Indian Cinema of the time. Dr. Hazarika came up with his own style of cinematic treatment and storytelling which was not just distinct but also cinematically convincing. Teeming with an intense socialistic zeal as an active member of Indian Peoples’ Theatre Association in the fifties, he too, was deeply moved by the weal and woes, relentless struggles and hope and aspirations of the common masses and devoted himself to creative works related to folk music and culture of the common Assamese people. ‘Era Bator Sur’ was an outcome of one such creative effort. The story and the music of ‘Era Bator Sur’ reflect the emotional attributes and effusions of the people of that era. The film is a cerebral , sensitive and highly realistic portrayal of a young artist’s empirical and emotional quest of the essence of his art, the abhorrent exploitation of the downtrodden, the simplicity and credulity of tribal farmers. But ‘Era Bator Sur’ is above all, as Dr. Bhupen Hazarika himself admitted on many an occasion , an intensely autobiographical film. The protagonist Jayanta Duara , a man of sensitive ,dainty and conscientious artistic temperament , who was modelled on Dr. Hazarika himself to a great extent, fell in love with and proposed to Nisha Phukon, a popular actress . But they failed to get along with each other. It was then that Jayanta Duara set out on his mission in quest of the tunes of the abandoned folk songs with a sense of conviction that the soil of his motherland, hopefully, would not misunderstand him. The cast of the movie included seasoned actor of contemporary Hindi cinema Balraj Sahni, stalwarts like Phani Sarmah, Bishnu Rabha, Dr. Bhupen Hazarika’s maiden venture could neither create ripples at the national level nor click at the box office. Eclipsed by films like Satyajit Ray’s ‘Aporajito’ and Asit Sen’s ‘Salasal’, ‘Era Bator Sur’ apparently was lost in the maze. But it was a trendsetter in Assamese Cinema in which symbolism of profound suggestivity and poetic beauty was effectively used for the first time. The haunting melody of its songs coupled with sublime meaning has lingered on . Lata Mangeskar rendered her golden voice to present an unforgettable melody in Assamese when she sang for the first time for Dr. Bhupen Hazarika–“Jonakore Rati Asomire Mati....’’to perpetuate Bhupen Hazarika’s credentials .
Dr .Hazarika’s second Assamese film and third directorial venture was ‘Sakuntala’(1961), which was a celluloid adaptation of the classical epic drama “Abhigyanam Sakuntalam”. He dealt with the original storyline of the epic drama in his own innovative style .Although his treatment of the story elicited criticism ,the film turned out to be a crowed puller in its own right. Its music ,which was composed by Dr Hazarika himself, waltzed its way into the hearts of thousands and was extolled for its meaning and melody. “Sakuntala’ is a milestone in his filmography as well in that it was his first film which brought him a coveted National Award in the form of the President’s Silver Medal for the Best Regional Film of the year.
In 1964, Bhupen Hazarika came up with his third Assamese film, ‘Protidhwani’. It was again a trademark Bhupen Hazarika film which was a fusion of stark realism, social relevance, familiar fantastical and melodramatic stuff of the mainstream movies. Lying at the core of ‘Protidhwani’ was a sincere desire to highlight and promote the age old harmony and fraternity that have existed untainted since time immemorial among the different communities and tribes inhabiting the hills and plains of the North East India in a purely apolitical and artistic context. The plot of the film drew blood from a well-known Khasi love story ‘Manik-Raitong’. The film was exulted by both critics and connoisseurs for its art direction, costumes and superb performances of a few characters, specially that of Bishnu Prasad Rabha who played a Khasi King in the film. Dr. Bhupen Hazarika was once more at his best as the music director and its wonderful music and lyrics were rendered immortal by the golden voices of seasoned singers like Talat Mehmud, Sumon Kalyanpur and Bhupen Hazarika himself. His brilliant effort did not go unnoticed and unrecognised. ‘Protidhwani’ brought Bhupen Hazarika the President’s Silver Medal for the second time.
Dr. Bhupen Hazarika’s 1966 movie, ‘Lotighoti’ broke away a bit from his usual cinematic narratives and stylistics, but firmly stuck to his creed . He turned a bit experimentative and innovative both in themes and techniques while making “Lotighoti”. The film convincingly conjures up a realistic picture of the numerous deterrents that the film directors from the Eastern part of the country, who had to go to Tollygunge, the Mecca of filmmaking , for making their own films had to encounter. In a subtle yet sardonic tongue-in-the-check tone, Dr. Hazarika admirably recreated a veracious spectacle of the way in which the directors of his own times compromised or rather were made to compromise with the given situation to achieve desired success in their ventures. As part of his cinematic experimentations, he cast characters in roles closer to those in their own life. For instance, Ratna Ojah , an exponent of Vaishnavite culture was cast as Dhanpati Bayan and he had to do in the film what he was accustomed to do in his personal life. Similarly renowned dance maestro Jatin Goswami was asked to play a dance teacher in the film. All that lent an extra touch of realism to the film. He repeated the same experiment in his next film ‘Sikmik Bijuli’ with desired success. ‘Lotighoti’ earned Bhupen Hazarika the President’s Silver Medal for a third time.
Dr. Bhupen Hazarika has directed three more full length Assamese feature films since ‘Lotighoti’. But none of them----‘Sikmik Bijuli’(1969), ‘Mon Prajapoti’(1979) and ‘Siraj’(1988)—could grab accolades from the critics or steal the show at the box office .Some critics allege that the equilibrium of the art cinema and the formulaic mainstream movie had somehow gone wayward in these films . It would be ,however, unjust to dismiss them as mediocre or average stuff. The connoisseurs of Dr. Hazarika’s films never fail to discern the marked improvement of cinematic treatment and techniques in these films. Despite their failure to click at both film festivals and box office, they stand out among the contemporary Assamese films for a variety of reasons and are generally hailed as laudable cinematic efforts. “Sikmik Bijuli”(1969) hit the screen in the same year Assamese Cinema was raving over the emergence of its first blockbuster ‘Dr. Bezborua’(1969). Although the spectacular commercial success and hitherto unknown technical finesse of ‘Dr. Bezborua’ overshadowed the emotion-clad tear-jerking realism of ‘Sikmik Bijuli’, the latter could still manage to find a cosy room for itself in the domain of Assamese cinema. As a realistic portrayal of the seamy slum life , which is an integral part of city life, the film depicts a touching story of the ‘modus vivendi’ of the slum dwellers, their hopes, aspirations, thoughts and values. In the film in which Bijoy Shankar, Bidya Rao and Tasduq Yousuf played the leads, famous Bengali actress Ruma Guha Thakurta was cast in a very catchy role. The film also did a fairly good business. Hailed by many as a thought provoking philosophical exploration of and probing into love relationships and certain other related crucial socio-cultural issues , ‘Man Prajapoti’ broke way from the popular mould and set a new trend of story selection in Assamese cinema. The music of both ‘Sikmik Bijuli’ and ‘Man Prajapoti’ , however, clicked and kept Dr. Hazarika’s reputation as a top ranked music director intact. ‘Siraj’(1988), which was based on a popular short story was literally a remake of Natasurya Phani Sharma’s 1948 film of the same name. The film was redesigned and refurbished keeping in mind the palates and needs of the current audience and presented as a glowing tribute to the legendary artist. Dr. Bhupen Hazarika made a full length Assamese feature film, ‘Miri Jiyori” for Doordarshan on celluloid. He also directed, composed music and sang for ‘Mahut Bandhure’ in 1958, a Bengali film which depicted the eternal bond of love, obedience and tolerance between man and elephant. He produced, directed, and composed music for Arunachal Pradesh’s first Hindi feature film in colour ‘Mera Dharam Meri Ma’ in 1977. He directed a colour documentary for the Arunachal Pradesh Government on Tribal folk songs and dances entitled ‘For Whom The Sun Shines’ in 1974. He produced and directed a documentary ‘Emuthi Saular Kahini’ based on the co- operative movement for the Govt. of Assam entirely in lyrical form. He produced and directed a half-hour documentary for Calcutta Doordarshan Kendra in 1977 on the folk songs and dances of North East India entitled ‘Through Melody and Rhythm.’ He also produced another 18-part documentary entitled ‘Glimpses of the Misty East’ on the socio economic and cultural progress in North Eastern India from 1947 to 1997, assigned to him by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of India for celebration of Fifty years of India’s Independence. In a valiant bid to restore the glory of the first Assamese movie “Joymoti’ and its maker Jyoti Prasad Agarwala, Bhupen Hazarika went through fire and water to restore the distorted and damaged print of “Joymoti”. With utmost diligence and assiduity , he made a documentary movie on the life of Jyoti Prasad, incorporated it with the restored print ,meticulously edited the whole project in 1976 . The result was a precious docu-feature ‘Rupkonwar Jyoti Prasad Aru Joymoti, in which he himself rendered the voice over commentary.
Dr. Bhupen Hazarika’s outstanding contributions to cinema are not circumscribed to only a handful of good films and documentaries that he made. Connoisseurs of Dr. Bhupen Hazarika would never deny that the filmmaker in him lapses into quiescence beside the colossal singer, lyricist and music composer in him. The film director in him might have failed at times ,but the music director of his films has always triumphed. He has composed music and sung for the maximum number of Assamese films over the last five decades. Apart from his own films, the other Assamese films that he composed music for are ’Sati Beula’(1954), ‘Pioli Phukon’(1955),’Dhumuha’(1957), ‘Kecha Sone’(1959), ‘Puwati Nishar Sapon(1959),’Moniram Dewan’(1964), ‘Khoj’(1975), “Chameli Memsab’(1975),’Palashar Rang’(1976), “Banahansa”(1977), “Banjui’(1978), “Akon”(1980), “Aparoopa’(1982), ‘Angikar’(1985), ‘Juge Juge Sangram’(1986), ‘Ma’(1986), ‘Sankalpa’(1986), ‘Protishodh’(1987), ‘Priyajan’(1993), ‘Asanta Prahar’(1994), ‘Pani’(1995) and Sati Radhika. He grabbed the National Award of Best Music Director for Abdul Majid’s ‘Chameli Memsab’ in 1975. The only Bodo film for which Dr. Bhupen Hazarika has composed music is ‘Jeuni Simang’.(1987). He gave music for one Bhojpuri film entitled ‘Sath Maiya Ki Mahima’(1979).
He directed music in a number of outstanding Bengali films, such as ‘Jiban Trishna’, ‘Jonakir Alo’, ‘Mahut Bandhure’, ‘Kari o Komal’, ‘Asamapta’, ‘Ekhane Pinjar’, ‘Dampati’, ‘Chameli Memsaab’, ‘Dui Bechara’, ‘Simana Periye”, ‘Gajamukta’ and ‘Sopan. Bhupen Hazarika composed music for several well-known Hindi films, which include quite a few award winning movies. They are ‘Aroop’, ‘Meri Dharam Meri Ma’’, ‘Chameli Memsab’, ‘Ek Pal’, ‘Rudaali’, “Papiha’, ‘Saaz’, ‘Darmian’, ‘Mil Gaye Manzil Mujhe”, “Gaja Gamini’, ‘Daman” and ‘Kyon”. Thus Dr. Bhupen Hazarika’s outstanding contribution to Indian Cinema in general and Assamese Cinema in particular also consists in his majestic works as a singer, lyricist and music composer of the highest calibre. This is what seems to have had a profound bearing upon Dr. Bhupen Hazarika’s selection for the most prestigious film award of our country. When the Dada Saheb Phalke Award was conferred on him in 1994 for lifetime achievements as an auteur , special mention was made of his extraordinary role in giving Indian film music an unprecedented dignity and grace.
No doubt, as a filmmaker reposing faith in ‘middle’ or ‘fusion’ cinema, Dr. Bhupen Hazarika could never elevate himself to the artistic and technical heights of his contemporary illustrious counterparts. He could never amaze the film fraternity with a ‘Do Bigha Jamin’ or a “Pyassa’ or a ‘ Mother India or a ‘Pather Panchali’. But that can hardly undo his reputation as a venerable filmmaker . His charismatic touch as a prodigious music maestro aptly makes up for his lacuna as a filmmaker. Legendary film theorist ,scholar and critic, Andre Bazin opined that it could be misleading to judge the greatness of a great filmmaker always in the light of his creative masterpieces and artistic success as such an approach often undermines the consistency of temperament and tastefulness in a director, his relentless struggle to tide over the impasses inside and outside him. Bazin’s dictum seems pretty relevant to any assessment of an auteur like Dr. Bhupen Hazarika .

Saturday, July 16, 2011

Nothing Forbidden about 'Forbidden Fruit'(Kielletty hedelma )........!!


No wonder “ Forbidden Fruit”( Kielletty hedelma )stole the show in quite a few prestigious Film festivals despite being a redundant melodramatic brooding from many a perspective..! This Finnish film has just gifted me a thoroughly engrossing time. Seems I have fallen under the spell of Finnish cinema after having savoured quite a few in the last couple of weeks….! To say in a nutshell, ‘Forbidden Fruit’ is about the Laestadians, a huge community of Finnish people,who are diehard conservatists tenaciously insisting on taking scripture literally and forbidding their members from indulging in all forms of pleasures deemed ‘epicurean’ and “worldly” — such as dancing, premarital sex, alcohol, television, movies, and contraception. It is a gripping tale of two Laestadian teens ,and their fluttering faith…But , above all, it is a cerebral film on the regressive nature of any form of extreme conservatism that robs life of all its naturalistic joys and makes it drab and dreary…. Director Dome Karukoski’s melodramatic flick probes into how two Laestadian teens go through fire and water to come to terms with the impositions inflicted upon them by their community. The first to rebel against the system and thereby threaten to pollute the prestige and sanctity of the Order is Maria, a headstrong teenager who refuses to show allegiance to the Laestadian community’s asceticism straightaway and moves to metropolitan Helsinki in the pursuit of ‘pleasures’. Plunging recklessly into a ‘no-holds-barred’ lifestyle, she rationalizes her choices by falling back on the idea that she can always purge herself of her ‘sins’ at a later point through the ritualistic repentance and confession , atonement and absolution.. Meanwhile, the deeply perturbed doyens of the community persuade the young woman’s best friend, die hard conservative Raakel to aid them and send her out into the world to bring the rebel back. Unsurprisingly, Raakel, too, falls under the spell of the world of sensual pleasures she experiences and soon dabbles into them, displaying her sheer reluctance to imprison herself once more in the cocoon of self-denial in which she was forced to take shelter in her traditional life . The film would make u feel the muddles of a Catch 22 situation that unhinge the minds of those who have gusts to question the impropriety of conservatism and assert their hearts… Top-notch performances of the leads and technical finesse add to its appeal ….

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

A Cerebral n Sensitive Flick on Student Prostitution


One in three university students in Germany would resort to prostitution or other sex works as a means to finance his /her education.In France, the statistics is no less alarming. (29%)Hundreds of recent studies and surveys have revealed beyond doubt that student prostitution is not just an open secret but a common phenomenon in most of the ' developed' European countries with a supposedly massive student support system.....Based on a Memoir by a 19-year-old language student , ‘Student Services’(French,2010) is a harrowing tale of student prostitution in Europe. Laura D, a 19-year-old student of Spanish and Italian, details in her memoir, Mes Chères Etudes, how she had virtually no other option but to take to prostitution at the age of 18 when she could not afford her rent, books, or food, despite a part-time telesales job. Her parents – lower middle class people earning just above the minimum wage - could not support her, but their jobs meant she did not qualify for financial aid. ‘Student Services’ challenges the much hyped contention that student prostitution is mainly synonymous with happy hookers, glacial belles de jour and tragic victims..... It rather brings to light the two real culprits behind the tragedy-----abject poverty and a hollow and dysfunctional student support system. ...A flick that centres round student prostitution, ‘Student Services’ is natural replete with an exorbitant dose of erotic stuff.....!But be sure here is a flick that will never entice you to salivate over the Lolita-esque potential . ..! The top-notch performance of the lead would amaze you.. If you are a connoisseur of cinema, do not forget to discern the film’s creative cinematography...